From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,32397e53f83af42a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-27 09:37:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: profiler Date: 27 Oct 2003 12:22:33 -0500 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: References: <8ylmb.9212$mZ5.51086@attbi_s54> NNTP-Posting-Host: shevek.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1067275574 6960 128.183.235.101 (27 Oct 2003 17:26:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 27 Oct 2003 17:26:14 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:1740 Date: 2003-10-27T17:26:14+00:00 List-Id: Peter Hermann writes: > Steve wrote: > > What compiler? > > What OS? > > not specific (portable project). we have different possibilities. The Gnu toolset provides a profiler. The Gnu toolset (including GNAT) is portable to most interesting operating systems, so that's probably your best bet. But why are you profiling a non-specific compiler? Profiling is only necessary when you have a performance problem; clearly you don't, since you don't have specific requirements. -- -- Stephe