From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6ea75cb98c3c832d
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!uns-out.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pc02.usenetserver.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: [Q] pragma Warnings
References: <1196276028.10481.19.camel@kartoffel>
From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 17:37:33 -0500
Message-ID: <uprxszniq.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/22.1 (windows-nt)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vfaOyF9XfxZbkJRqVnC/zVrzWG8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com
Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com
X-Trace: cfd74474f3f29e05e48ed01825
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18674
Date: 2007-11-29T17:37:33-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Georg Bauhaus <rm.tsoh+bauhaus@maps.futureapps.de> writes:

> Is there an alternative to placing compiler specific
> pragma Warnings in portable (pragma-wise) Ada programs?

With GNAT project files, it is easy to specify different command-line
options for different source files.

There are command line options to disable specific warnings.

So you can disable warnings at the file level (not the line level).

For non-GNAT compilers, it may be more difficult to specify different
command-line options for different files. Gnu make can do it, but it
is a pain.

-- 
-- Stephe