From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c32fe290813aec20
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!out02b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in02.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!uns-out.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: New Ada portable GUI Library?
References: <6d63c543-0a35-4c39-a330-98c63a24f64d@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
 <1365533.nRhg4MZKNK@linux1.krischik.com>
  <4e5ffa74-e1d6-4e80-9dd9-824df475a60c@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
  <970df333-8c12-4f5d-b32b-ded6a84a0195@v4g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
  <b90d01a4-5996-41b6-811d-4c7052fa0580@x69g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
  <utzlhq2h4.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
  <083148e5-c5fe-450f-acbb-83391c6483c4@k39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 05:07:40 -0500
Message-ID: <uprw4pvo3.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/22.1 (windows-nt)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ioC/tP7Gqpcu1rYB7qs1s/wp5uE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com
Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com
X-Trace: 4720f478b3378e05e48ed16535
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19399
Date: 2008-01-14T05:07:40-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Lucretia <lucretia9@lycos.co.uk> writes:

> On Jan 13, 1:28 pm, Stephen Leake <stephen_le...@stephe-leake.org>
> wrote:
>> Lucretia <lucret...@lycos.co.uk> writes:
>> >  Ada GUI Thick bindings
>> > ------------------------
>> >  Ada GUI Thin bindings
>> > ------------------------
>> >   C abstraction layer   <- Can be provided via C or Ada depending on
>> > lowest layer
>> > ------------------------
>> >    X11 | GtkAda | QT
>>
>> GtkAda is already a thick binding. Surely you meant Win32 there?
>
> No, I meant it as an option. Like I've already covered in another
> post, I personally would just use Gtk and wrap it in abstract C calls
> ready for the thick Ada code.

That's what GtkAda already is!

What would you be doing different?

Better to put your energy towards improving GtkAda.

-- 
-- Stephe