From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f51e93dacd9c7fca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-19 12:41:00 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-06!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: status of Ada STL? Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:42:11 -0500 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: <3d0f0c40_1@news.tm.net.my> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3719.2500 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29192 Date: 2002-09-19T14:42:11-05:00 List-Id: Marin David Condic wrote in message ... >To be cynical about it, the last time there was an effort in this area, >nobody "official" popped up with tons of enthusiasm to declare something to >be the right answer. To be hopeful about it, at least I've seen comments in >Ada Letters and elsewhere that seem to indicate that there is some official >recognition of the need to have *some* kind of library(ies). There is an open AI for container libraries for Ada 200Y. The problem is, everyone is willing to write an interesting library, but there is much less enthusism for the hard work it takes to make something suitable for standardization. (Compare the documentation for the typical library with the RM for Ada.Strings.Fixed, and you'll see what I mean). Then, compound that with getting everyone to agree on the requirements and the solution... >Ada needs some mechanism for defining "Official" >responses to users needs that takes something less than ten years to react. That is being studied. Of course, the study may take the ten years. :-) >Maybe I just need more coffee this morning. :-) Yes, I think so. :-) Randy Brukardt