From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f51e93dacd9c7fca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-09-18 08:25:59 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!sn-xit-05!sn-xit-06!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Matthew Heaney" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: status of Ada STL? Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 11:23:14 -0400 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: <3d0f0c40_1@news.tm.net.my> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:29114 Date: 2002-09-18T11:23:14-04:00 List-Id: "Marin David Condic" wrote in message news:aeq2as$l0m$1@nh.pace.co.uk... > > Unless some collection of stuff gets declared to be The Ada Answer in some > semi-official or conventional/customary way, someone with a more integrated > answer (such as C++ & STL or Java and all its class libraries) is always > going to have a hard-to-overcome competitive advantage. All the > protestations of "But you can download one of a dozen...." or "You can bind > to ...." or "You can go cobble together tools from these dozen...." won't > overcome the one-stop-shopping and integrated advantage of some competing > languages. I have written a library, called Charles, modeled on the C++ STL, which has all the container types in that library (vectors, deques, lists, sets, multisets, maps, and multimaps). http://home.earthlink.net/~matthewjheaney/charles-20020918.zip Both active and passive iteration is supported.