From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fb49422438d459d8 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-06 18:01:40 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!cyclone.bc.net!sjc70.webusenet.com!news.webusenet.com!elnk-nf2-pas!newsfeed.earthlink.net!stamper.news.pas.earthlink.net!stamper.news.atl.earthlink.net!newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net.POSTED!not-for-mail Sender: mheaney@MHEANEYX200 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: access type must not be outside generic body References: From: Matthew Heaney Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 01:01:39 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.110.133.135 X-Complaints-To: abuse@earthlink.net X-Trace: newsread1.news.atl.earthlink.net 1065488499 65.110.133.135 (Mon, 06 Oct 2003 18:01:39 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 18:01:39 PDT Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:354 Date: 2003-10-07T01:01:39+00:00 List-Id: chris writes: > What does this mean? I moved the offending code to the spec and it > compiles fine. The situation looks something like this This question was asked on 18 Mar 1997, in the thread with the subject "subprogram access types and generic packages". For the answer see the responses from Bob Duff and Tucker Taft. http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&threadm=E7CHyw.n0q.0.-s%40inmet.camb.inmet.com&rnum=10&prev=/groups%3Fhl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DISO-8859-1%26q%3Dgeneric%2Bprivate%2Bpart%2Bof%2Bspec%2Baccess%2Btype%2Bbody%26meta%3Dgroup%253Dcomp.lang.ada