From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid113ae9,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!193.252.118.146.MISMATCH!news.wanadoo.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail Sender: obry@PASCAL Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.java.help Subject: Re: ADA vs Java References: From: Pascal Obry Date: 19 Jun 2005 08:42:34 +0200 Message-ID: Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jun 2005 08:42:43 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.120.22.92 X-Trace: 1119163363 news.wanadoo.fr 1255 82.120.22.92:1934 X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11477 comp.lang.java.help:17742 Date: 2005-06-19T08:42:43+02:00 List-Id: HansF writes: > Are you implying that no Ada compiler has any bugs? Building safety-critrical software is possible in Ada and no Ada vendor will have such disclamer (Ada is used in the most critical application around). The point is that Ada can be used with a certified runtime or no runtime at all in some implementation. Pascal. -- --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://www.obry.net --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" --| --| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595