From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Blady
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: String_Access in unbounded string handling?
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 10:54:24 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID:
References:
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 09:54:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="bc1174016ac0056bd2ce15ce8f2a7536";
logging-data="2054159"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Ckjcv/6innj5/L/GruR/5"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:DBA9Yf3s/H4CH4F27MKgfiVgmEU=
Content-Language: fr, en-US
In-Reply-To:
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:65999
List-Id:
Le 17/01/2024 à 02:24, Randy Brukardt a écrit :
> "Jeffrey R.Carter" wrote in message
> news:uo0fs5$dja6$1@dont-email.me...
>> On 2024-01-14 12:05, Blady wrote:
>>>
>>> String_Access is defined in A.4.5 Unbounded-Length String Handling:
>>> 7 type String_Access is access all String;
>>>
>>> and note:
>>> 75 The type String_Access provides a (nonprivate) access type for
>>> explicit processing of unbounded-length strings.
>>>
>>> I wonder what String_Access is for and what could be "explicit
>>> processing"?
>>
>> String_Access is a mistake that should not exist.
>
> I agree with Jeffrey. Whatever reason it was initially put into the package
> has long since ceased to be relevant. And, as Dmitry notes, when you want
> such a type, it's usually because you didn't want to use
> Ada.Strings.Unbounded (or Bounded). So the placement is odd at best.
>
> Randy.
Thanks for all your answers,
This is probably a very minor subject, however I submitted it:
https://github.com/Ada-Rapporteur-Group/User-Community-Input/issues/79
Pascal.