From: Blady <p.p11@orange.fr>
Subject: Limited with too restrictive?
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 17:11:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <unucno$89u$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
Hello,
I want to break some unit circularity definitions with access types as
for instance with record:
type R1;
type AR1 is access R1;
type R1 is record
Data : Natural;
Next : AR1;
end record;
In my case, I have a unit:
package test_20240113_modr is
type R2 is record
Data : Natural;
end record;
type AR2 is access R2;
end test_20240113_modr;
"limited withed" in:
limited with test_20240113_modr;
package test_20240113_mods is
procedure PS1 (V : test_20240113_modr.R2);
procedure PS2 (V : test_20240113_modr.AR2);
end;
Let's imagine the circularity, thus PS1 and PS2 definition are legal.
Of course the following isn't legal:
type AS1 is array (1..2) of test_20240113_modr.R2; -- illegal
However why not with access type:
type AS2 is array (1..2) of test_20240113_modr.AR2; -- illegal
Likewise, why not:
type AS3 is record
Data : Natural;
Next : test_20240113_modr.AR2; -- illegal
end record;
Isn't "limited with" too restrictive, is it?
Well, I could make some code transferts from unit to another or access
conversions, that's I actually do but at heavy cost.
Thanks, Pascal.
next reply other threads:[~2024-01-13 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-13 16:11 Blady [this message]
2024-01-14 4:31 ` Limited with too restrictive? Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox