From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,101730fbd6919745
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-11 09:57:03 PST
Path:
archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!freenix!wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Obry
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada & .Net (Rotor)
Date: 11 Apr 2002 18:56:42 +0200
Organization: Home - http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
Message-ID:
References:
<4519e058.0204080645.32b63ee1@posting.google.com>
<7vvgb0ngnk.fsf@vlinux.voxelvision.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: avelizy-103-1-5-161.abo.wanadoo.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 1018544223 14542 80.13.115.161 (11 Apr 2002 16:57:03 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 11 Apr 2002 16:57:03 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22371
Date: 2002-04-11T16:57:03+00:00
List-Id:
"Marin David Condic" writes:
> "Pascal Obry" wrote in message
> news:ur8lnd5o4.fsf@wanadoo.fr...
> > work with. Of course it is always a bit tricky to build Open Source
> softwares
> > on this platform (it is quite easier to use the Microsoft Compiler and
> > environment), but with a bit of effort it is possible to build a lot of
> the
> > nice tools we have on Unix (thanks to Cygwin).
> >
> In what way is it tricky to build Open Source software on Windows? Can you
> not build Open Source software using a Microsoft compiler? Maybe you can't
> give away their part of the software but it would seem that anything you
> build is yours.
I don't understand this part.
> Or do you mean that much Open Source software is developed for various
> flavors of Unix and hence doesn't always translate well to Windows?
Ok, I meant that.
> Just trying to understand where you're going with this. Lots of us use Ada
> on PC's with Windows and I don't think that precludes development of Open
> Source (depending on your definition of "Open Source" too...)
Well, I also use a lot Ada, but to build GCC/GNAT, GDB, Emacs, CVS (pserver),
gpg, AWS, GLADE, AdaSockets, OpenSSL, OpenSSH, GDBM... you really need to have
a UNIX like environment. Or you need to port the software to avoid using
GNU/configure, GNU/automake or GNU/autoconf tools or whatever UNIX oriented
part that just does not work on Windows.
Pascal.
--
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"