From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4d85dafcfa1dcde6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-05-10 07:14:22 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GPS - A new kind of IDE? Date: 10 May 2002 10:13:34 -0400 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: References: <9Y1A8.25350$D%5.3478@sccrnsc01> <5ee5b646.0205061352.456c075a@posting.google.com> <3cd7b506.11293318@news.demon.co.uk> <3CDB2F01.78B66E87@adaworks.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1021040398 12622 128.183.220.71 (10 May 2002 14:19:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 May 2002 14:19:58 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:23836 Date: 2002-05-10T14:19:58+00:00 List-Id: Peter Hermann writes: > I strongly recommend to let GPS its well known original definition. Assuming you mean "Global Positioning Satellite", I think that is in a sufficiently different domain that overloading with "GNAT Programming System" is clear from context. There are only so many meaningful three letter acronyms! > It is also not pleasant to have e.g. several "GLIDE"s, "GLADE"s etc. I only know of one GLIDE, but I do know of two GLADEs; one is the GNAT distributed annex implementation, one the Gtk GUI builder. I agree these are from sufficiently similar domains that the overloading is sometimes confusing. > and I would wonder about someone who called his product e.g "USA" or > "LA" etc.. Even Ada does not allow to use its 69 keywords as > ordinary identifiers ;-) I like the name US Robotics, even if they don't make robots anymore :). Hmm, guess they got bought by 3Com. -- -- Stephe