From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,72bd3676155508c5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-11-13 06:49:29 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Format of .adp files? Date: 13 Nov 2002 09:49:08 -0500 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: References: <3dcfc6ce$0$308$bed64819@news.gradwell.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1037199603 28351 128.183.235.92 (13 Nov 2002 15:00:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 13 Nov 2002 15:00:03 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:30805 Date: 2002-11-13T15:00:03+00:00 List-Id: "Eric G. Miller" writes: > In , Eric G. Miller wrote: > > > In <3dcfc6ce$0$308$bed64819@news.gradwell.net>, Victor Porton wrote: > > > >> Which is the exact format of .adp (Ada projects for Emacs) > >> files? I found no such files in the Internet... > > > > It's documented in the GNAT User's Guide w/ gcc 3.x. > > I take it back. I'm pretty sure the Ada project for Emacs (.adp) is > not the same as the GNAT project file (.gpr). Sorry for the confusion. The .adp format is used by GNAT 3.14 and Emacs ada-mode; the .gpr format is used by GNAT 3.15. There is an Ada program to translate .gpr to .adp, which is how Emacs reads the .gpr format. Note that it is not possible to go from .adp to .gpr, because the .gpr format supports multiple "inherited" projects, while the .adp format does not. So the Emacs "wizzy" editing mode for project files is now even less useful (I never used it anyway). -- -- Stephe