From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,b3a175786beb9c7e,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-10 07:47:49 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: SourceForge vs Savannah Date: 10 Oct 2003 10:41:53 -0400 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1065797107 17872 128.183.235.92 (10 Oct 2003 14:45:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Oct 2003 14:45:07 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:603 Date: 2003-10-10T14:45:07+00:00 List-Id: chris writes: > I'd rather use Savannah than SF for anything. SF keep changing their > T&C's and I've lost track of what's what on there. Could you expand on this? What's "T&C". Hmm - Terms & Conditions? I'm considering moving my library to either SourceForge or Savannah. I was leaning towards Savannah, but then someone pointed out that being on SourceForge makes it easier for others to find, which is an important point. > I would be willing to submit some of my work provided I got the > ability to work on it and extend it. I would even be willing to hand > over my copyright, again providing I got the ability to play with it > (also some credit) and it was some kind of group. That's what licensing is all about. The GPL, or the GMGPL, gives you what you are asking for. -- -- Stephe