From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,f93e461e8491e322 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!208.49.83.154.MISMATCH!uns-out.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pc02.usenetserver.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Limited_Controlled, orthogonality and related issues References: <1169139744.717060.69070@51g2000cwl.googlegroups.com> From: Stephen Leake Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 04:57:40 -0500 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:0E4AqLJ9eBHU73t6STlrbez+nio= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com X-Trace: af58745b09615759e00d426244 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:8320 Date: 2007-01-19T04:57:40-05:00 List-Id: "Adam Beneschan" writes: > I say "almost never" because in theory, since the private part or body > of P or of a child of P (or the visible part of a private child of P) > *could* derive a type extension from the tagged type and dispatch. But > I'd guess that such usage would be rare. Not "rare"; I have several programs that do just that :). -- -- Stephe