From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 146b77,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid146b77,public
X-Google-Thread: f5d71,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-Thread: 103376,d275ffeffdf83655
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen <ohk@maestro.clustra.com>
Subject: Re: Ada vs C++ vs Java
Date: 1999/02/16
Message-ID: <umqg1878e2o.fsf@maestro.clustra.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 444742996
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: fwall.clustra.com
References: <369C1F31.AE5AF7EF@concentric.net>
 <tz5n2.4608$TO5.129375@ptah.visi.com> <369DDDC3.FDE09999@sea.ericsson.se>
 <369e309a.32671759@news.demon.co.uk> <77ledn$eu7$1@remarQ.com>
 <77pnqc$cgi$1@newnews.global.net.uk> <m3ww2mgzmj.fsf@mheaney.ni.net>
 <8p64spq5lo5.fsf@Eng.Sun.COM> <77t3ld$nou$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <79ce4s$lfq$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <79chc7$ko6@drn.newsguy.com>
 <79dodb$rhf$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <umqbtj9m636.fsf@maestro.clustra.com>
 <79fm3e$ffs$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <umq679g45y3.fsf@maestro.clustra.com>
 <EACHUS.99Feb8141309@spectre.mitre.org> <79oj6d$eg8$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <umq679aegyo.fsf@maestro.clustra.com> <79s23i$ena$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com>
 <umqsocdjin4.fsf@maestro.clustra.com> <36C854AA.1776@cacd.rockwell.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.vxworks,comp.lang.java
X-Complaints-To: abuse@telia.no
Date: 1999-02-16T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"P.S. Norby" <psnorby@cacd.rockwell.com> writes:

> Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen wrote:
> > 
> 
> > There are indeed many horrible aspects of the C++ language.
> > But there are thread libraries freely available. It should not matter
> > that they are not part of the standard, right? :-)
> > 
> 
> So, there are sort libraries freely available. It should not matter that
> they are not part of the standard, right? :-)
> -- 
> P.S. Norby
> 
> "No excuses.  No embarrassment.  No apologies...
>  Ada -- the most trusted and powerful programming language
>  on earth, or in space." -- S. Tucker Taft
>  
> \\\    \\\    \\\    \\\    \\\    \\\    \\\    \\\    \\\ 
> ( :)   ( :)   ( :)   ( :)   ( :)   ( :)   ( :)   ( :)   ( :)
> ///    ///    ///    ///    ///    ///    ///    ///    /// 
> (Speaking only for myself)

Sorry, but this was just my tongue-in-the-cheek answer to the original
poster who argued strongly that sort should not be standardized, but
that threads must be.

I would rather standardize both.

-- 
E pluribus Unix