From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f5d71,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gidf5d71,public X-Google-Thread: 109fba,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Thread: 146b77,d275ffeffdf83655 X-Google-Attributes: gid146b77,public From: Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen Subject: Re: Ada vs C++ vs Java Date: 1999/02/05 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 440957405 X-NNTP-Posting-Host: fwall.clustra.com References: <369C1F31.AE5AF7EF@concentric.net> <369DDDC3.FDE09999@sea.ericsson.se> <369e309a.32671759@news.demon.co.uk> <77ledn$eu7$1@remarQ.com> <77pnqc$cgi$1@newnews.global.net.uk> <8p64spq5lo5.fsf@Eng.Sun.COM> <77t3ld$nou$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <79ce4s$lfq$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <79chc7$ko6@drn.newsguy.com> <79dodb$rhf$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.vxworks,comp.lang.java X-Complaints-To: abuse@telia.no Date: 1999-02-05T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: robert_dewar@my-dejanews.com writes: > In article <79chc7$ko6@drn.newsguy.com>, > mike wrote: > > Look at this code below posted here recently by another > > poster. This code sorts a list of names inputed from > > stdin, look how clear, short, elegent, and easy to read > > it is. > > > > > That truly is the silliest example we have had in an > otherwise informative thread. > > I can only say that if you think this argument is valid, > then you will love APL, where the same sorting routine can > be done in 4 or 5 characters (you do not have to put up > with wordy things like "sort" in APL, since sorting can be > done with a single character!). > > -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- > http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own But the point you seem to be missing is that this libarry now is a *standard* part of C++. Comments? -- E pluribus Unix