From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aea4cc77526f5e4a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!edtnps89.POSTED!023a3d7c!not-for-mail Sender: blaak@METROID Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Separate Compilation in Programming Languages References: <7xJvj.7420$Ru4.4246@newssvr19.news.prodigy.net> <5b9wj.4639$Mh2.1432@nlpi069.nbdc.sbc.com> <5Ekwj.10401$0o7.6822@newssvr13.news.prodigy.net> <%Ntwj.12620$Ch6.11402@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net> From: Ray Blaak Message-ID: Organization: The Transcend User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 19:15:42 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.66.252.228 X-Trace: edtnps89 1204053342 208.66.252.228 (Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:15:42 MST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 12:15:42 MST Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20103 Date: 2008-02-26T19:15:42+00:00 List-Id: writes: > But, as Mr. Kennedy notes in a separate contribution to this > thread, > > "Actually, this doesn't accomplish as much as you wish, in practice, as > it will eventually be necessary to have a constructor for the real > class, or else a static factory method." I have addressed this question in another post. There are perfectly adequate work arounds. Ada does dependency control better, but it is perfectly possible in Java, and I make use of these techniques myself. -- Cheers, The Rhythm is around me, The Rhythm has control. Ray Blaak The Rhythm is inside me, rAYblaaK@STRIPCAPStelus.net The Rhythm has my soul.