From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a5449b9a03812b50 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-13 15:14:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!arclight.uoregon.edu!wn4feed!worldnet.att.net!208.49.253.98!newsfeed.news2me.com!sn-xit-05!sn-xit-06!sn-post-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT documentation question Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 17:15:00 -0500 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: <3D417AB2.ADDD3F7A@boeing.com> <5ee5b646.0207281109.3894cc74@posting.google.com> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3719.2500 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27989 Date: 2002-08-13T17:15:00-05:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote in message <5ee5b646.0207281109.3894cc74@posting.google.com>... >James Squire wrote in message news:<3D417AB2.ADDD3F7A@boeing.com>... >> "Grein, Christoph" wrote: >> > >> > BTW, you quote chapter and verse incorrectly, it should >> > be A.13(15). > >By the way, it seems that this particular documentation >requirement got omitted from Annex M, which is probably >an oversight. No, I think it is intentional (Bob probably can tell us for sure). A.13(15) is a "documentation requirement"; Annex M lists "implementation-defined characteristics". They're not the same. Annex M also omits some of the other core "documentation requirements" (J.7.1(12-13); A.5.2(44); as well as A.13(15)) but also includes others (A.5.2(45), 13.11(22)), so it hard to tell what the intent is. (This is also true for the specialled needs annexes; a large number of the "documentation requirements" are not included in Annex M.) I think this will have to be taken to the ARG for a (short) discussion, so the editor (me) can determine what fix is appropriate. Randy.