From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,4751d44ff54a2c2c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-08-13 14:15:20 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "Randy Brukardt" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: 64-bit integers in Ada Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 16:14:43 -0500 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: <3CE3978F.6070704@gmx.spam.egg.sausage.and.spam.net> <3D46DC69.7C291297@adaworks.com> <5ee5b646.0207301613.5b59616c@posting.google.com> <5ee5b646.0208030424.39703482@posting.google.com> <3D4C2805.62563584@adaworks.com> <5ee5b646.0208040607.ebb6909@posting.google.com> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3719.2500 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:27988 Date: 2002-08-13T16:14:43-05:00 List-Id: Robert Dewar wrote in message <5ee5b646.0208040607.ebb6909@posting.google.com>... >> Though there are few machines still >> extant that use storage multiples of other than >> eight-bits, they do still exist. I think the compiler for the Unisys >> 11xx series has a word size of 36 bits. Randy can correct me >> on that if I am wrong. > >Yes, of course it's 36 bits (that was a port of Alsys >technology with which I am familiar). That's the Ada 83 compiler. The Ada 95 compiler is a port of Janus/Ada. And, yes it has a word size of 36-bits. (Although the compiler internally considers it a machine with 9-bit storage units with strong alignment requirements. This matched the code generator better (which was created for C), and insured that strings were packed without standing on ones head.) Randy.