From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2e8cf506f89b5d0a
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-19 14:33:34 PST
Path:
archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!isdnet!wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Obry
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Looping over a tagged record?
Date: 19 Jun 2001 23:32:49 +0200
Organization: Home - http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
Message-ID:
References: <9god9a$g04$0@208.164.98.151>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mix-velizy-107-4-202.abo.wanadoo.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 992986388 11210 193.249.47.202 (19 Jun 2001 21:33:08 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jun 2001 21:33:08 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.0.103
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8898
Date: 2001-06-19T21:33:08+00:00
List-Id:
"M R Goodwin" writes:
> Hi!
>
> This is a part practical, and a part 'I wonder' type problem.
> I have a tagged record that is pretty big. Most, but not all of
> the elements in it are a bounded string type. Because I don't feel
> like the typing and all I would need to do to assign and later change
> values, I was wondering if there is anyway to loop over all elements in
> the record, checking their type and then taking the right action...
And now to answer your question: No there is no way to iterate through record's
fields.
Pascal.
--
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--|
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"