From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,47bc849aad30d586
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-01 23:52:58 PST
Path:
archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!newsswitch.lcs.mit.edu!newspump.monmouth.com!newspeer.monmouth.com!uvsq.fr!freenix!wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Obry
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: XML and Ada was RE: A standard package for config files is needed
Date: 02 Jun 2002 08:52:58 +0200
Organization: Home - http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
Message-ID:
References:
NNTP-Posting-Host: avelizy-103-1-2-35.abo.wanadoo.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 1023000778 18287 217.128.15.35 (2 Jun 2002 06:52:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 2 Jun 2002 06:52:58 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.90
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25187
Date: 2002-06-02T06:52:58+00:00
List-Id:
Ok I see, what you say is that XML is great (I agree), that it is very close
to Ada in syntax and part of the semantic (I agree)... but XML and Ada are
completly different beasts in usage and Java can benefit from XML as much as
Ada can in my point of view.
Pascal.
--
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595