From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a9bbfb8cd49f1a51 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!teaser.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail Sender: obry@PASCAL Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Isn't this in favour of Ada?? References: <42d64dde$0$64794$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk> <87ll3hyi14.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <1FzEL7m558iW@eisner.encompasserve.org> <877jf02ud1.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> From: Pascal Obry Date: 06 Aug 2005 12:33:28 +0200 Message-ID: Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: 06 Aug 2005 12:33:29 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.120.157.180 X-Trace: 1123324409 news.wanadoo.fr 876 82.120.157.180:4081 X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:3998 Date: 2005-08-06T12:33:29+02:00 List-Id: Pascal Obry writes: > And ??? Isn't this like saying that C++ is not suitable to the concurrency > challenges because it does not support IO multiplexing? Just use the same > library with Ada that you use with C++ for the IO. Reading the C++ RM you > certainly won't find a single work about IO multiplexing. Rereading your mail I see that it was related to tasking and IO multiplexing is related to threading. So I withdraw my comments. Pascal. -- --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://www.obry.net --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" --| --| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595