From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid113ae9,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!freenix!news.wanadoo.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail Sender: obry@PASCAL Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.java.help Subject: Re: ADA vs Java References: From: Pascal Obry Date: 18 Jun 2005 10:23:32 +0200 Message-ID: Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: 18 Jun 2005 10:23:40 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.124.119.218 X-Trace: 1119083020 news.wanadoo.fr 912 82.124.119.218:2404 X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11465 comp.lang.java.help:17720 Date: 2005-06-18T10:23:40+02:00 List-Id: Eric Sosman writes: > (In other words: Are there any objective data to support > the opinion that either Ada or Java is "more reliable" than > the other? Surveys, experiments, studies, ...?) Probably SUN has. The license quote explicitly that Java MUST NOT be used to control nuclear power plant for example. No Ada vendors are saying that Ada must not be used for safety critical projects. Don't you think this is related to safety/reliability ? Pascal. -- --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://www.obry.net --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" --| --| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595