From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,92f1b9f519795959 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsread.com!news-xfer.newsread.com!nntp.abs.net!news.abs.net!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Gnat 3.15p pragma issues References: <1131029395.700984.154230@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> From: Stephen Leake Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:xcy0TwWkhS8UMHqu9inLvV5lBxY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:02:39 -0500 NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.159.65.1 X-Complaints-To: abuse@toad.net X-Trace: news.abs.net 1131109370 66.159.65.1 (Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:02:50 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:02:50 EST Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6182 Date: 2005-11-04T08:02:39-05:00 List-Id: "Erik Woulfe" writes: > One of the problems that I encounter when making this move is that > the Gnat compiler does not recognize many of the pragma statements > that Apex had no problems with. However, I do not think that any/all > of these are Apex specific, such as pragma "Inline" and pragma > "Not_Elaborated". Can you give an example of such code, together with the error message GNAT 3.15p produces? I've used GNAT 3.15p with lots of 'pragma Inline'. On the other hand, 'pragma Not_Elaborated' is _not_ standard Ada; search for it in the Ada Reference Manual - you won't find it. -- -- Stephe