From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a3736685ef876ab2
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!newshub.sdsu.edu!tethys.csu.net!nntp.csufresno.edu!sn-xt-sjc-03!sn-xt-sjc-07!sn-post-sjc-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Matthew Heaney <matthewjheaney@earthlink.net>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: OO Style with Ada Containers
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:50:21 +0000
Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
Message-ID: <uir3zaqz6.fsf@earthlink.net>
References: <1195082906.420079.195000@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
 <1s27rv0gt4ujj$.3e2k326rp54d.dlg@40tude.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (windows-nt)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Aqr0J4E9emOFMUs6WQoEbdKET0Q=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18501
Date: 2007-11-19T02:50:21+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> writes:

> OO is traditionally based on dynamic polymorphism. Ada containers follow
> STL design based on templates, i.e. static polymorphism. That isn't much
> OO.

But his question was about using distinguished-receiver syntax, not OOP per se.
Container types are tagged, so you can use prefix notation, so all is well.