From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.58.253.33 with SMTP id zx1mr4542706vec.10.1390143106131; Sun, 19 Jan 2014 06:51:46 -0800 (PST) Path: Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!backlog4.nntp.dca3.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!ottix-news.ottix.net!news.litech.org!news.glorb.com!6no18335703qao.1!news-out.google.com!gg4ni9679qab.0!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.earthlink.com!news.earthlink.com.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 08:51:45 -0600 From: Dennis Lee Bieber Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Delays for implementations of Fortran features Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 09:51:53 -0500 Organization: IISS Elusive Unicorn Message-ID: References: X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 6.00/32.1186 X-No-Archive: YES MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com NNTP-Posting-Host: 76.249.30.247 X-Trace: sv3-9v6ZYH7/gw7DwFeuYu90HfPYYLc2iKIBcjuqHxjvIkF/LEY1ex+8ncQEL9Hvzq/INClA5Ip5TjA1DDP!PkRxb/Eh/rnDCK8qnwpWWXQLvXi8AcnDsHlOqLwwulzTNeWKzR93Sfy7v34Li9TFw4F176BvxuMg!Cu7LhtC5ArsgplPpYEAEzGw9/3I= X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.40 X-Original-Bytes: 2868 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com comp.lang.ada:184474 Date: 2014-01-19T09:51:53-05:00 List-Id: On Sun, 19 Jan 2014 15:06:15 +0100, "J-P. Rosen" declaimed the following: >Le 19/01/2014 14:50, Simon Clubley a écrit : >> Sometimes I wonder (and this is a general comment on language committees, >> not something directed to specific language committees like Fortran and >> Ada) if the temptation is to continue adding features into a language, >> even if the language doesn't need it, just so the language committee can >> continue in it's job, even if adding those features were to make the >> language more complex than it needs to be. > >Not for the sake of the committee, but a language team that would stop >following the trends and simply say "that's enough, we keep it like >this" would kill the language. > >Whether you like it or not, you have to keep moving to prove that you're >not dead. The trick is to differentiate the motion from rot and decay effects. -- Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN wlfraed@ix.netcom.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/