From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Thread: 113ae9,aef4913dd6741a38 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,gid113ae9,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news.glorb.com!newsfeed.stueberl.de!proxad.net!193.252.118.146.MISMATCH!news.wanadoo.fr!news.wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail Sender: obry@PASCAL Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.java.help Subject: Re: ADA vs Java References: From: Pascal Obry Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Date: 20 Jun 2005 08:30:02 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Jun 2005 08:30:04 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 82.124.126.113 X-Trace: 1119249004 news.wanadoo.fr 918 82.124.126.113:2850 X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11489 comp.lang.java.help:17766 Date: 2005-06-20T08:30:04+02:00 List-Id: HansF writes: > But you do not answer the question, which is (rephrased): "Are you > implying that there are no bugs in any Ada compiler?". I did not answer this question because it is not a question, I mean you pretty well know the answer. All piece of software has bugs. But softwares built with Ada tends to have far less bugs per sloc than other languages. See recent thread on comp.lang.ada for ref documents. Pascal. -- --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://www.obry.net --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" --| --| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595