From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,34257fd17abeba14 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!atl-c08.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pc03.usenetserver.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [SPARK] Code safety and information hiding References: <%%QFg.913090$084.629274@attbi_s22> <20060821131232.Q662@docenti.ing.unipi.it> From: Stephen Leake Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 06:51:59 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bn58iehZhydeCGAAntI5HQ7GW0Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com X-Trace: 2204c44eae1df759e00d417050 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6314 Date: 2006-08-22T06:51:59-04:00 List-Id: Colin Paul Gloster writes: > Stephen Leake has written: > > "[..] > > Hmm. Now that I think about it, it would be easy to implement a > run-time check for that rule. But it would be a waste of time in the > production system. Might still be worth it; I have other run-time > checks for similar rules (in particular, "symbols must be written > before being read") that are hard to check otherwise. > > [..]" > > Was simply Ada code run in the application to check the rule meant by > that, or do you have customized run-time checks in your GNAT run-time > kernel? Just Ada code; no modifications to the compiler run-time. -- -- Stephe