From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,35862b8253794e65 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-04-09 19:19:07 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.cwix.com!newscon01.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.com!newssvr11.news.prodigy.com.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Pat Rogers" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada References: <3CB0CD37.52B43088@yahoo.com> <3CB32A54.A3A9E975@yahoo.com> <3CB349CB.7CF3391A@yahoo.com> <3CB36065.1BC7FF6B@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Requeue X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: 208.191.177.131 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: newssvr11.news.prodigy.com 1018405082 ST000 208.191.177.131 (Tue, 09 Apr 2002 22:18:02 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2002 22:18:02 EDT Organization: Prodigy Internet http://www.prodigy.com X-UserInfo1: SCSGWWCEJKVOBTT^]BCB^]\@PJ_^PBQLGPQRZQMIWIWTEPIB_NVUAH_[BL[\IRKIANGGJBFNJF_DOLSCENSY^U@FRFUEXR@KFXYDBPWBCDQJA@X_DCBHXR[C@\EOKCJLED_SZ@RMWYXYWE_P@\\GOIW^@SYFFSWHFIXMADO@^[ADPRPETLBJ]RDGENSKQQZN Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 02:18:02 GMT Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:22292 Date: 2002-04-10T02:18:02+00:00 List-Id: "Anatoly Chernyshev" wrote in message news:3CB36065.1BC7FF6B@yahoo.com... > > Ya nye penemiyu. I gave you a rather lengthy intro to the requeue semantics as > > well as a pointer to a good textbook dedicated to concurrency with Ada. Others > > did as well. The Rationale would have been a good thing for me to have > > included, and it is not the "FM", so are you complaining about someone pointing > > you to the Rationale, and, if so why? > > Poimite zhe nakonec. I appreciate your efforts (frankly, no kidding) and comments of > other people and I'm not complaining a bit. > I simply issued a distracted remark (mainly in response to R. Dewar's post) meaning > that everyone could become Ada guru just pointing others to Rationale and if people > will always follow > his advice, there will be no need for CLA. Especially for periodically arisen > questions like "How to convert integer to string". > But I never expected that great programmers are so offensive. I'm sure he meant no offense; I was remiss in not mentioning the Rationale to you myself. Definitely worth reading because (by definition) it explains why the language contains what it does, which helps people use the language well. I very much appreciated "Studies In Ada Style" (for Ada 83) for the same reason. Best regards, Pat