From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,28cd155693714664 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-16 21:10:35 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-04!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail From: "David Botton" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Faulty languages and Liability Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 00:09:16 -0400 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: <3D0C7C0B.5000707@mail.com> <27085883.0206161028.276e62e4@posting.google.com> <3D0D31D2.2000104@mail.com> X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26115 Date: 2002-06-17T00:09:16-04:00 List-Id: I don't think any one is advocating lawsuits, just mentioning that if there should be a case, the choice of tools used to build software should be put in question. Ada being an example of a better safer tool that is readily available and frequently not chosen for non technical reasons. David Botton "Hyman Rosen" wrote in message news:3D0D31D2.2000104@mail.com... > Sure they are, when an Ada advocate starts suggesting product liability > lawsuits.