From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a414836333dfef7 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-29 07:08:08 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Elaboration in GNAT Date: 29 Nov 2001 08:30:11 -0500 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Message-ID: References: <1006952193.650930@edh3> <3C052930.4FE65C5D@Raytheon.com> <5ee5b646.0111281944.22e7cae4@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1007040753 3646 128.183.220.71 (29 Nov 2001 13:32:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: dscoggin@cne-odin.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 29 Nov 2001 13:32:33 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17164 Date: 2001-11-29T13:32:33+00:00 List-Id: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes: > Mark Johnson wrote in message news:<3C052930.4FE65C5D@Raytheon.com>... > > Robert of course may give you slightly different > > suggestions. One that I tend > > to ignore is to not use "gnatwa", but to specify exactly > > which warnings you > > want and don't want. I have found over the last several > > months that added > > warnings from gnatwa are beneficial and I'm sticking with > > it. > > > > --Mark > > > That's fine, but you have to be prepared for new warnings > to pop up without warning, since we often add new warnings! This is true. However, they usually indicate true defects in my code. I agree with Mark; my code gets better with each release of GNAT! Keep up the good work, Robert :). -- -- Stephe