From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4e02731064e80d04
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Jon S Anthony <jsa@synquiry.com>
Subject: Re: Ada - State of the art tools... lacking
Date: 1997/12/24
Message-ID: <ufn2hq7cma.fsf@synquiry.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 309973694
Distribution: world
References: <01bd102d$fcfbb910$652da8c0@steved_home>
 <01bd108a$12194860$baeb649b@freeman>
Organization: PSINet
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-12-24T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


"Jon Jensen" <jon.jensen@hci.utah.edu> writes:

> 
> Did you look at using Delphi?  Were there specific reasons you didn't use
> it?  It seems like from you message it would have been a much better fit
> than Object Ada.

How can you tell?  Suppose portability is an issue.  Once it is in
Ada95, it will run basically anywhere (quite possibly with little or
no change).  OTOH, if NT is all they will ever want, maybe you're
right.

-- 
Jon Anthony
Synquiry Technologies, Ltd., Belmont, MA 02178, 617.484.3383
"Nightmares - Ha!  The way my life's been going lately,
 Who'd notice?"  -- Londo Mollari