From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,34d47d048b177d0b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Jon S Anthony Subject: Re: limited/non-limited in Ada95 Date: 1997/10/22 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 282472139 Distribution: world References: <3442C2A3.3781@bix.com> Organization: PSINet Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-10-22T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes: > > < course I looked at this sort of approach. It sucks even more than > forcing reference semantics.>> > > Saying something "sucks" without examples and a technical argument is > not debate, it is empty rhetoric. Shrug. I'm not going to give all the details here in a silly newsgroup. Besides, without knowing any of the details, as you admit, your original comment is basically empyt rhetoric as well. That's basically NEWS. > I am not talking about that case either, whatever made you think I was? > The fact that I said "in the context of the GNAT project"? By that I Yes. > just meant that this was the context of the discussions on how to do > things, not that we were talking about special compiler support. Hmmm, I find that odd. I'd certainly take advantage of compiler support in such a context. Whatever... /Jon -- Jon Anthony Synquiry Technologies, Ltd., Belmont, MA 02178, 617.484.3383 "Nightmares - Ha! The way my life's been going lately, Who'd notice?" -- Londo Mollari