Re: US Government looking into memory safe programming

[Kevin Chadwick <kc-usenet@chadwicks.me.uk>]

>> Or when they realize that there is only one rust compiler, and therefore
>> that a single compiler virus could ruin the whole defense system.
>
>Good point !
>
>Still some doubts about their ability to reason that far ;)

Whilst I have in the past refused to use lattice semi conductor hardware due
 to a CDN preventing secure compiler verification, whilst apparently noone
 or few noticed. 

I assume you mean trojaned compiler code inserted upstream to disable
 protections or ignore unsafe code?

Or do you mean utf-8 library code substitution aimed at a particular
 compiler?

-- 
Regards, Kc