From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,e17a4d5bc0d42b86 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-02 09:33:23 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!news-out.usenetserver.com!newsfeed.bc.tac.net!news.bc.tac.net!not-for-mail Sender: blaak@TORUS Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and JVM? Why not AdaVM? References: <94vdt9$a2g1@news.cis.okstate.edu> <87ae8crrpw.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87ae89e95w.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> <87g0hyames.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> From: Ray Blaak Message-ID: Organization: The Transcend X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.6.42/Emacs 19.34 Date: 02 Feb 2001 09:33:31 -0800 NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.53.149.68 X-Complaints-To: news@bctel.net X-Trace: news.bc.tac.net 981135192 209.53.149.68 (Fri, 02 Feb 2001 09:33:12 PST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 09:33:12 PST Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:4870 Date: 2001-02-02T09:33:31-08:00 List-Id: Florian Weimer writes: > Ronald Cole writes: > > Why would anyone want an Ada to emacs-lisp translator? > > Why would anyone want an Ada to Java translator? ;-) See my other reply in this thread. The JVM can support real languages. Emacs bytecode interpreter supports only Elisp -- completely dynamic, no lexical scoping, etc. -- Cheers, The Rhythm is around me, The Rhythm has control. Ray Blaak The Rhythm is inside me, blaak@infomatch.com The Rhythm has my soul.