From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on
	ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A,
	T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Jeffrey R.Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.acm.org.not>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Equivalence between named access and anonymous access.
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 18:18:11 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <udct43$3200c$1@dont-email.me>
References: <uda2ql$2hle9$1@dont-email.me> <uda7c1$2ids2$1@dont-email.me>
 <udcsdo$31uib$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2023 16:18:11 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b97c7f9cd77bb8f7702f299c14add81e";
	logging-data="3211276"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18nQxbQ2rnYlJ0sn53QIKk9gUOIAucenU0="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.15.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:IuxOeepBPLKBuFL/RXcHG25qGTM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <udcsdo$31uib$1@dont-email.me>
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:65615
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 2023-09-07 18:06, Blady wrote:
> 
> Why choosing named access for New_BorderLayout and anonymous access for 
> AddLayoutComponent or GetLayoutComponent for the type of parameters P1_xxx and 
> the return type?

It's very poor design to have access types in the visible part of a non-private 
pkg spec.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"This language [Ada] has a remarkable power of expressiveness,
something vital to the rapid development of complicated software,
and its 'strong typing' makes it easy to debug and modify."
Scott and Bagheri
160