From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,9960fa51a4a478af
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-07 07:06:28 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail
From: Stephen Leake <stephen.a.leake.1@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: ACT announces availability of GNAT 3.14p
Date: 07 Feb 2002 10:06:24 -0500
Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Message-ID: <ud6zhqqkv.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov>
References: <5ee5b646.0201301849.4e951bcb@posting.google.com>
 <e7ebd224.0202061336.767f7a9d@posting.google.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1013094642 3762 128.183.220.71 (7 Feb 2002
 15:10:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: dscoggin@cne-odin.gsfc.nasa.gov
NNTP-Posting-Date: 7 Feb 2002 15:10:42 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:19708
Date: 2002-02-07T15:10:42+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

karlran1234@yahoo.com (Karl Ran) writes:

> dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) wrote in message
> news:<5ee5b646.0201301849.4e951bcb@posting.google.com>...
> 
> > GNAT 3.14p NEW FEATURES LIST
> 
> [tons of cool features deleted]
> 
> I just installed 3.14p, but I'm still getting the (old)linker warnigs:
> 
> 
> <snip description of warnings about 'mktemp'>
> 
> What did I do wrong? I thought I completely removed the old
> version(3.13)

What you did wrong was to assume that 3.14p fixed these warnings :).

This warning says that the gnat runtime is using some "deprecated"
functions. Apparently ACT has decided not to fix this.

> Karl, 
> who tends to ignore (new)warnings when warnings are present all the
> time :(

Yes, I agree it is bad to ignore warnings. In this particular case, it
is warnings in code you did not write, so I would be less nervous. But
a bug report to report@gnat.com does seem in order.

-- 
-- Stephe