From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,de183036289811c4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-19 07:22:48 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!opentransit.net!wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail From: Pascal Obry Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Requeue in GNAT 3.14p (Linux) Date: 19 Jun 2002 16:22:38 +0200 Organization: Home - http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: avelizy-103-1-2-90.abo.wanadoo.fr Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 1024496568 6332 217.128.15.90 (19 Jun 2002 14:22:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jun 2002 14:22:48 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.90 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26378 Date: 2002-06-19T14:22:48+00:00 List-Id: Dmitry A. Kazakov writes: > Hi! > > The following code is the distilled problem. When a chain of external > requeues returns back to a protected object it causes a hang-up on the > last requeue. It happens in GNAT 3.14p under Linux. Interestingly is > that under Windows NT it works. I found nothing in ARM that forbids > that. Is it a GNAT bug? You can't have IO in a protected object. Does it hang if you remove the IO ? Pascal. -- --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" --| --| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595