From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,de183036289811c4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-19 07:22:48 PST
Path:
archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!opentransit.net!wanadoo.fr!not-for-mail
From: Pascal Obry
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Requeue in GNAT 3.14p (Linux)
Date: 19 Jun 2002 16:22:38 +0200
Organization: Home - http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
Message-ID:
References:
NNTP-Posting-Host: avelizy-103-1-2-90.abo.wanadoo.fr
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: wanadoo.fr 1024496568 6332 217.128.15.90 (19 Jun 2002 14:22:48 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@wanadoo.fr
NNTP-Posting-Date: 19 Jun 2002 14:22:48 GMT
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2.90
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:26378
Date: 2002-06-19T14:22:48+00:00
List-Id:
Dmitry A. Kazakov writes:
> Hi!
>
> The following code is the distilled problem. When a chain of external
> requeues returns back to a protected object it causes a hang-up on the
> last requeue. It happens in GNAT 3.14p under Linux. Interestingly is
> that under Windows NT it works. I found nothing in ARM that forbids
> that. Is it a GNAT bug?
You can't have IO in a protected object. Does it hang if you remove the IO ?
Pascal.
--
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--| http://perso.wanadoo.fr/pascal.obry
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-key C1082595