From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,912597791e813f68 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-01-21 06:57:55 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: advantages or disadvantages of ADA over pascal or modula Date: 21 Jan 2003 09:55:42 -0500 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: References: <3E171612.E4E2972@t-online.de> <3E296128.4183B70A@t-online.de> <3E2C7C94.9D7ED14@t-online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1043161684 16768 128.183.235.92 (21 Jan 2003 15:08:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Jan 2003 15:08:04 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:33296 Date: 2003-01-21T15:08:04+00:00 List-Id: Alfred Hilscher writes: > A friend of mine works in the embedded area and he is using Modula-2. > (www.pmsgmbh.de) I often tried to get him to Ada, but there are far less > Ada-tools than Modula-tools, and the prices for Ada are far beyond of > what he could spend. Just for comparison, what are the costs for the Modula tools, and what support do you get for that cost? GNAT for embedded x86 can be had for free, if you are willing to work without formal support. -- -- Stephe