From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,d970333fd2f0ec06 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!npeer03.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!post02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.flashnewsgroups.com-b7.4zTQh5tI3A!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ASIS : questions about the ASIS status against the Ada reference References: <8b07543e-6328-4b9a-8f43-56d3eec9f57c@g20g2000vba.googlegroups.com> From: Stephen Leake Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2009 02:25:45 -0400 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xot8VpAXYm3Ff10bHr0+viVRDrQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: abuse@flashnewsgroups.com Organization: FlashNewsgroups.com X-Trace: 5a5b34a2a0be8e9cadf9d11228 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6324 Date: 2009-06-06T02:25:45-04:00 List-Id: "Hibou57 (Yannick Duch�ne)" writes: > Looking at the ASIS package specifications and even more at the ASIS > issues at ada-auth, I began to feel that a lot of efforts are still > running at making ASIS able to fully represent all possible Ada 2005 > constructions. Right. > From here, comes these fundamental questions : > > - Is the ability of ASIS to represent all Ada 2005 constructions > formally provable ? I doubt it. But why do you want to know? > - Can ASIS be viewed as another expression of a part of the Ada 2005 > reference in a special formalism ? Probably. > While I know ASIS is mainly useful for code analysies, audits, > statistics, etc, I though about another question which may give an > answser to these two latter ones : formally speaking (although perhaps > not practicable), is it theorically possible to imagine a compiler > builded around ASIS ? I don't see how; ASIS presumes a compiler that generates the information ASIS uses. Why build another compiler on top of that? -- -- Stephe