From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,8b3d7c27160f8353 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-01-04 06:17:25 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!canoe.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Package name duplication in Hierachical Libraries Date: 04 Jan 2002 09:11:20 -0500 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Message-ID: References: <3c32e619$1@pull.gecm.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1010153712 1467 128.183.220.71 (4 Jan 2002 14:15:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: dscoggin@cne-odin.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Jan 2002 14:15:12 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18517 Date: 2002-01-04T14:15:12+00:00 List-Id: "Stuart Forster" writes: > I have a problem with duplicated package names in hierarchical libraries. > > The example below results in an infinite recursion of B.A.C where I was > hoping for > > >Test > B.A.C > A.C > > > > Is this the correct behaviour? Yes, the compiler is doing what you told it to do. Within package "B", the name "A.C" refers to "B.A.C". To get the one you want, use "Standard.A.C". > -- -- Stephe