From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Luke A. Guest" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Parameterised 'Image Attributes Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 09:25:44 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2023 08:25:44 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d6b8f11288c89c64b992283513aef529"; logging-data="212953"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/q3yHJ6aiNg2Lk2Xz6vh/cTum5jxYwOvk=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.14.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:A4cEaxEwjpW9jN6ABgxPzhGv68E= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:65534 List-Id: On 18/08/2023 08:18, Rod Kay wrote: > Hello.all, > > >    There has been some recent discussion on #ada irc regarding > formatted output. > >    Would it be possible/desirable to allow the 'Image attribute to have > formatting parameters ? Something along the lines of ... > > >    put_Line (some_Integer'Image (Width => 5, Padding => '0')); > > > ... and similar 'Image attribute parameters for other types. > > >    If the parameters have defaults, then there should not be any > backwards compatibility issues (I think). I wanted them for ages, but there was a conversation ages ago where someone on here said attributes were for "debugging only," yet that's not what the arm says.