From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on ip-172-31-65-14.ec2.internal X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,NICE_REPLY_A, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Jeffrey R.Carter" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Parallel loops in GNAT? Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 14:44:02 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2023 12:44:02 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0bdea567d600e13a1352ac5b1e6f8852"; logging-data="1869891"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+464b5MAwKAGHMX8g+KvOpDoFxypoDaoI=" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:TsW0z0/LFn2Yaf5A+Xfp7B1x3eY= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:65509 List-Id: On 2023-08-13 12:39, Simon Wright wrote: > Jerry writes: > >> Does GNAT such as Simon's GCC 13.1.0 for macOS aarch64 allow parallel >> loops and blocks? > > No, sorry, that's one of the advanced features that AdaCore aren't > working on yet. > > https://blog.adacore.com/ada-202x-support-in-gnat ISO/IEC 8652:2023 is the first Ada standard to be approved without a working implementation. Probably a bad sign. -- Jeff Carter "If a sperm is wasted, God gets quite irate." Monty Python's the Meaning of Life 56