From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,43ff490aee692a6a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-04 12:48:00 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ASCL project on AdaPower.net Date: 04 Dec 2001 15:41:18 -0500 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Message-ID: References: <9ucgi0$7g2i6$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <1aNO7.46920$xS6.76554@www.newsranger.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1007498665 939 128.183.220.71 (4 Dec 2001 20:44:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: dscoggin@cne-odin.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 4 Dec 2001 20:44:25 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17408 Date: 2001-12-04T20:44:25+00:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison writes: > Just to restate my position, I don't think we need a set of requirements to vote > on (at least not these; new ones perhaps...). Instead, what we need a *the* set > of requirements written down, where we can point newcommers (and possibly > provide an explanation why). We certianly don't need the amount of "further > dicussion" implied by the fourth column on that page. In fact, words cannot > express how much we don't need that. :-) Well, I only count six people voting, and they haven't voted on all the requirements. I find that too small to count as "concensus". I guess I'm into a more formal process than you are :). -- -- Stephe