From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a26758eec3c2e1ad X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-06-14 09:03:33 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!logbridge.uoregon.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Use of XML for config files Date: 14 Jun 2002 11:54:08 -0400 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: References: <3CFC5DB2.A21DCF61@cs.tu-berlin.de> <4519e058.0206041129.5b250124@posting.google.com> <4519e058.0206100702.5a4b431a@posting.google.com> <3D0769F7.68F5BD9C@san.rr.com> <4519e058.0206130618.2ef74ee8@posting.google.com> <3D096286.8070002@telepath.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1024070520 19225 128.183.220.71 (14 Jun 2002 16:02:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 14 Jun 2002 16:02:00 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:25950 Date: 2002-06-14T16:02:00+00:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison writes: > Perhaps it would be a good idea to support XML saving and restoring as > a kind of "import/export" function. That way people could run the > config file through XML tools they might have if they want to do that > for some reason, without it being the default. Since there are so many choices for how to represent config file information as XML, I don't think I want to do this. People can write their own converter, using the reference Config_Files implementation (assuming we end up with a non-XML standard). > I suppose another "We're *all* right!" weasel option would be to put > multiple file format save/restores in child packages. Perhaps we > could even make a save/restore tagged type that folks can supply, > with (preferably) something producing human-readable output as the > default. Too many standards spoil the code :). > > I was excited to be on the bandwagon for once; sometimes I get > > tired of swimming upstream all the time :(. > > At least all that exercise is good for your heart.... :-) :). -- -- Stephe