From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,de0abe9655235740 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-10-10 08:07:49 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!hammer.uoregon.edu!skates!not-for-mail From: Stephen Leake Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ACM Ada Letters Date: 10 Oct 2003 11:05:42 -0400 Organization: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (skates.gsfc.nasa.gov) Message-ID: References: <1065708924.347689@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <3F864440.7070203@noplace.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: anarres.gsfc.nasa.gov Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: skates.gsfc.nasa.gov 1065798536 17872 128.183.235.92 (10 Oct 2003 15:08:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.gsfc.nasa.gov NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Oct 2003 15:08:56 GMT User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:604 Date: 2003-10-10T15:08:56+00:00 List-Id: Hyman Rosen writes: > Marin David Condic wrote: > > The paper copy? The on-line copy looks fine. In self-defense, the > > articles are not formatted by the submitters - you hand it over in > > .DOC format and the editors tinker with it from there. They may have > > had some problem between that and getting it to the printer. Look at > > the stuff at the SIGAda web site and see if thats any better. > > Yeah, it's the paper copy that's bad. It's fine on the SIGAda site. > But the paper copy is the one I read, and it's really annoying to have > it malformed. Someone's got to get on the ball. After all, I'm paying > for it! I noticed the same problem. I suggest we _all_ write a letter to the editor, asking them to fix the problem. -- -- Stephe