From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,7925ab534db73b8a,start X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: "John *NOSPAM* Bunk" Subject: What's the state of current Win32 PC Ada compilers? Date: 1998/09/25 Message-ID: #1/1 X-Deja-AN: 394797874 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 X-Trace: newsfeed.avtel.net 906745946 205.254.247.138 (Fri, 25 Sep 1998 10:52:26 PDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 1998 10:52:26 PDT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1998-09-25T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: Hello, I was wondering if anyone in USENET land had any real experience with using Aeonix or RR Software's Win32 capable Ada compilers for a large Windows NT project? If so, was the compiler fast/slow? Stable/Buggy? Code produced had compiler induced bugs / clean? Development environment decent / hard to use? Debugging facilities? Would you use these compilers again? Thanks for the input in advance, John