From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,cc4f25d878383cc X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-12-03 17:57:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!paloalto-snf1.gtei.net!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!chcgil2-snf1.gtei.net!news.gtei.net!news.binc.net!kilgallen From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Another Idea for Ada 20XX Date: 3 Dec 2001 19:56:57 -0600 Organization: LJK Software Message-ID: References: <3C0AACCE.329CFB60@worldnet.att.net> <45601fc.0112031740.3e217c8a@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: eisner.encompasserve.org X-Trace: grandcanyon.binc.net 1007431018 18595 192.135.80.34 (4 Dec 2001 01:56:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@binc.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 01:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:17369 Date: 2001-12-03T19:56:57-06:00 List-Id: In article <45601fc.0112031740.3e217c8a@posting.google.com>, byhoe@users.sourceforge.net (Adrian Hoe) writes: > The crash of NASA Mars probe proved the inability to communicate or to > standardize among those engineers. Wouldn't this be avoided if these > engineers agreed on a standardized unit of measurement? Again, will > the further augmentation of Ada (adding of units conversions and > checking) help to resolve this problem? If they simply used common type declarations, a lot of errors would be detected. If Meters is a new type and is used throughout, and Feet is another new type, it becomes difficult to add them. Again, in cross-language environments this was done for subprograms and records with a tool called a data dictionary -- years ago.