From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1108a1,59ec73856b699922 X-Google-Attributes: gid1108a1,public X-Google-Thread: fdb77,5f529c91be2ac930 X-Google-Attributes: gidfdb77,public X-Google-Thread: 103376,25d5234e7b6ca361 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-02-26 20:38:51 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!feed3.newsreader.com!newsreader.com!news-xfer.cox.net!cox.net!cyclone1.gnilink.net!spamkiller.gnilink.net!nwrddc04.gnilink.net.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: Hyman Rosen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030131 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.advocacy,comp.object,comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada versus language-X and "getting real work done" (was): 64 bit addressing and OOP References: <3E4E8F8C.9C096985@adaworks.com> <9fa75d42.0302250710.5549baaf@posting.google.com> <3E5C7033.BD5DC462@adaworks.com> <9fa75d42.0302260618.7506cba7@posting.google.com> <3E5CF5C6.84822F57@adaworks.com> <1046299823.547481@master.nyc.kbcfp.com> <1quq5v0sb922r76rbpmcs2pe19dr4i5a2r@4ax.com> In-Reply-To: <1quq5v0sb922r76rbpmcs2pe19dr4i5a2r@4ax.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 04:38:50 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 162.83.250.239 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verizon.net X-Trace: nwrddc04.gnilink.net 1046320730 162.83.250.239 (Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:38:50 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 23:38:50 EST Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.java.advocacy:59385 comp.object:58458 comp.lang.ada:34644 Date: 2003-02-27T04:38:50+00:00 List-Id: brougham3@yahoo.com wrote: > Why ... Why don't people read before writing? The OP claimed that the reason various battlefield communications systems didn't properly talk to each other was that they were programmed in different languages. This is utter nonsense. For systems to interoperate, they either all have to adhere to a rigorously defined protocol, or they have to be developed in tandem. The Ada web server that keeps getting mentioned here has no trouble serving browsers written in C++, I'm sure.