From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,24c70f80132ea540 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: No networking in Florist? References: <1192474217.628674.65600@v29g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <1192564043.758890.163550@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <871wbuk982.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> From: Markus E L Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:19:57 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Some cool user agent (SCUG) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BZqbg/6Ba8JkGKBwjXZHOKkoloQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 88.74.54.231 X-Trace: news.arcor-ip.de 1192572862 88.74.54.231 (17 Oct 2007 00:14:22 +0200) X-Complaints-To: abuse@arcor-ip.de Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!club-internet.fr!feedme-small.clubint.net!nuzba.szn.dk!pnx.dk!feeder.erje.net!news-fra1.dfn.de!newsfeed.arcor-ip.de!news.arcor-ip.de!not-for-mail Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:2474 Date: 2007-10-17T00:19:57+02:00 List-Id: Ludovic Brenta wrote: > Manuel Gomez writes: >> On 16 oct, 09:18, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote: >>> Manuel Gomez wrote: >>> > On 14 oct, 07:01, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote: >>> >> What's the reason that Florist (the POSIX.5 interface) doesn't >>> >> include networking? >>> > We have POSIX.Sockets, isn't that enough for networking? >>> >>> I can't find them in the versions of Florist I have on my systems >>> (Debian/unstable and Ubuntu/7.04). >>> >> >> I'm now aware that I had got installed an old package of Florist named >> libflorist-3.15p-1-dev which seems to be removed from Debian Etch [1]. >> The new package in Debian, libflorist-dev 2006-1, does not include >> posix-sockets. >> >> The Sourceforge project [2] does come with sockets. >> >> I wonder why. May be sockets support is buggy with current compiler? > > I maintain the Debian packages. I did not remove sockets from Florist; > they were removed upstream. Can you live with GNAT.Sockets as an > alternative? Upstream is AdaCore? Hm ... Regards -- Markus